Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ganni, Sandeep; Botden, Sanne M. B. I.; Chmarra, Magdalena; Goossens, Richard H. M.; Jakimowicz, Jack J. (2018)
Publisher: Springer US
Journal: Surgical Endoscopy
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: New Technology, Motion tracking, Laparoscopic skills, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Video-based assessment, Objective assessment, Training

Background: The use of motion tracking has been proved to provide an objective assessment in surgical skills training. Current systems, however, require the use of additional equipment or specialised laparoscopic instruments and cameras to extract the data. The aim of this study was to determine the possibility of using a software-based solution to extract the data. Methods: 6 expert and 23 novice participants performed a basic laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure in the operating room. The recorded videos were analysed using Kinovea 0.8.15 and the following parameters calculated the path length, average instrument movement and number of sudden or extreme movements. Results: The analysed data showed that experts had significantly shorter path length (median 127 cm vs. 187 cm, p = 0.01), smaller average movements (median 0.40 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p = 0.002) and fewer sudden movements (median 14.00 vs. 21.61, p = 0.001) than their novice counterparts. Conclusion: The use of software-based video motion tracking of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a simple and viable method enabling objective assessment of surgical performance. It provides clear discrimination between expert and novice performance.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549-1558. https://doi. org/10.1002/bjs.4816
    • 2. Jakimowicz JJ, Buzink S (2015) Training curriculum in minimal access surgery. In: Francis N, Fingerhut A, Bergamaschi R, Motson R (eds) Training in minimal access surgery. Springer, London, pp 15-34
    • 3. Botden SMBI, Jakimowicz JJ (2008) What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery?. Surg Endosc 23:1693-1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0144-1
    • 4. Bann S, Darzi A, Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?. Surg Endosc 18:485-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00464-003-9043-7
    • 5. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ, Broeders IAMJ, Tseng LNL (2005) The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training courseimproving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum. Surg Endosc 19:1220-1226. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00464-004-2240-1
    • 6. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance. Ann Surg 236:458-464. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008
    • 7. Hamilton E, Scott D, Fleming J, Rege R, Laycock R, Bergen P, Tesfay S, Jones D (2001) Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 16:406-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00464-001-8149-z
    • 8. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the eefctiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95:1088-1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6344
    • 9. Shanmugan S, Leblanc F, Senagore AJ, Ellis CN, Stein SL, Khan S, Delaney CP, Champagne BJ (2014) Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 57:210- 214. https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000031
    • 10. Oropesa I, Sánchez-González P, Lamata P, Chmarra MK, Pagador JB, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Gómez EJ (2011) Methods and tools for objective assessment of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.034
    • 11. Chmarra MK, Grimbergen CA, Dankelman J (2007) Systems for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 16:328-340. https://doi. org/10.1080/13645700701702135
    • 12. Chmarra MK, Klein S, Winter JCFD, Jansen F-W, Dankelman J (2009) Objective classicfiation of residents based on their psychomotor laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 24:1031-1039. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00464-009-0721-y
    • 13. Oropesa I, Chmarra MK, Sánchez-González P, Lamata P, Rodrigues SP, Enciso S, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Jansen F-W, Dankelman J, Gómez EJ (2013) Relevance of motion-related assessment metrics in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 20:299-312. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1553350612459808
    • 14. Hofstad EF, Våpenstad C, Chmarra MK, Langø T, Kuhry E, Mårvik R (2012) A study of psychomotor skills in minimally invasive surgery: what diferentiates expert and nonexpert per - formance. Surg Endosc 27:854-863. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00464-012-2524-9
    • 15. Ghasemloonia A, Maddahi Y, Zareinia K, Lama S, Dort JC, Sutherland GR (2017) Surgical skill assessment using motion quality and smoothness. J Surg Educ 74:295-305. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.006
    • 16. Yamaguchi S, Yoshida D, Kenmotsu H, Yasunaga T, Konishi K, Ieiri S, Nakashima H, Tanoue K, Hashizume M (2010) Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system. Surg Endosc 25:771-775. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00464-010-1251-3
    • 17. Kowalewski KF, Hendrie JD, Schmidt MW, Garrow CR, Bruckner T, Proctor T, Paul S, Adigüzel D, Bodenstedt S, Erben A, Kenngott H, Erben Y, Speidel S, Müller-Stich BP, Nickel F (2017) Development and validation of a sensor- and expert model-based training system for laparoscopic surgery: the iSurgeon. Surg Endosc 31(5):2155-2165. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00464-016-5213-2
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from