LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Rasmussen, KL; van der Plicht, J; Cryer, FH; Doudna, G; Cross, FM; Strugnell, J; Rasmussen, Kaare L.; Cryer, Frederick H.; Cross, Frank M. (2001)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Some fragments of the Dead Sea Scroll manuscripts were contaminated with castor oil in the late 1950s. We have conducted experiments in order to establish if the AAA pretreatment cleaning procedures conducted on Dead Sea Scroll manuscript samples in the last two dating series (Bonani et al. 1992; Jull et al. 1995) were effective in removing oil contamination. Our experiments show that not all oil contamination can be expected to have been removed by the acid-alkaline-acid (AAA) pretreatment, and that the radiocarbon ages previously reported therefore cannot be guaranteed to be correct. Any samples contaminated with castor oil were most likely reported with ages that are too young by an unknown amount.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bonani G, Ivy S, W├Âlfli W, Broshi M, Carmi I, Strugnell J. 1992. Radiocarbon dating of fourteen Dead Sea Scrolls. Radiocarbon 34(3):843-49.
    • Boyd-Alkalay E, Libman E. 1998. Preserving the Dead Sea Scrolls and Qumran artifacts. In: Flint P, Vanderkam J, editors. The Dead Sea Scrolls after 50 years. Brill: Leiden et al.:p 535-44.
    • Caldarero N. 1995. Storage conditions and physical treatments relating to the dating of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Radiocarbon 37(1):21-32.
    • Doudna G. 1998. Dating the scrolls on the basis of radiocarbon analysis. In: Flint P, Vanderkam J, editors. The Dead Sea Scrolls after 50 years. Brill: Leiden et al. p 430-71.
    • Doudna G. 1999. Redating the Dead Sea Scrolls found at Qumran: the case for 63 BCE. The Qumran Chronicle: 8(4). Special issue.
    • Mook W, van der Plicht J. 1999. Reporting 14C Activities and Concentrations. Radiocarbon 41(3):227-39.
    • Jull AJT, Donahue DJ, Broshi M, Tov E. 1995. Radiocarbon dating of scrolls and linen fragments from the Judean desert. Radiocarbon 37(1):11-19.
    • Stuiver M, Reimer PJ, Bard E, Beck JW, Burr GS, Hughen KA, Kromer B, McCormac G, van der Plicht J, Spurk M. 1998. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041-84.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok