Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bouman, Zita; Hendriks, Marc PH; Schmand, Ben A; Kessels, Roy PC; Aldenkamp, Albert (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: behavioral disciplines and activities
Introduction. Recognition and visual working memory tasks from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) have previously been documented as useful indicators for suboptimal performance. The present study examined the clinical utility of the Dutch version of the WMS-IV (WMS-IV-NL) for the identification of suboptimal performance using an analogue study design.Method. The patient group consisted of 59 mixed-etiology patients; the experimental malingerers were 50 healthy individuals who were asked to simulate cognitive impairment as a result of a traumatic brain injury; the last group consisted of 50 healthy controls who were instructed to put forth full effort.Results. Experimental malingerers performed significantly lower on all WMS-IV-NL tasks than did the patients and healthy controls. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed on the experimental malingerers and the patients. The first model contained the visual working memory subtests (Spatial Addition and Symbol Span) and the recognition tasks of the following subtests: Logical Memory, Verbal Paired Associates, Designs, Visual Reproduction. The results showed an overall classification rate of 78.4%, and only Spatial Addition explained a significant amount of variation (p <.001). Subsequent logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis supported the discriminatory power of the subtest Spatial Addition. A scaled score cutoff of <4 produced 93% specificity and 52% sensitivity for detection of suboptimal performance.Conclusion. The WMS-IV-NL Spatial Addition subtest may provide clinically useful information for the detection of suboptimal performance.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology. (2007). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) practice guidelines for neuropsychological assessment and consultation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 209-231. doi:10.1080/ 13825580601025932
    • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
    • Axelrod, B. N., Fichtenberg, N. L., Millis, S. R., & Wertheimer, J. C. (2006). Detecting incomplete effort with Digit Span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 513-523. doi:10.1080/13854040590967117 (2013).
    • Babikian, T., Boone, K. B., Lu, P., & Arnold, G. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of various digit span scores in the detection of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 145-159. doi:10.1080/ 13854040590947362
    • Bernard, L. C. (1990). Prospects for faking believable memory deficits on neuropsychological tests and the use of incentives in simulation research. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 715- 728. doi:10.1080/01688639008401014
    • Bortnik, K. E., Boone, K. B., Marion, S. D., Amano, S., Ziegler, E., Cottingham, M. E.,. . . Zeller, M. A. (2010). Examination of various WMS-III logical memory scores in the assessment of response bias. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 344-357. doi:10.1080/ 13854040903307268
    • Bouman, Z., Hendriks, M. P., Kerkmeer, M. C., Kessels, R. P., & Aldenkamp, A. P. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch version of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30, 228-235. doi:10.1093/arclin/acv013
    • Brennan, A. M., & Gouvier, W. D. (2006). Are we honestly studying malingering? A profile and comparison of simulated and suspected malingerers. Applied Neuropsychology, 13, 1-11. doi:10.1207/ s15324826an1301_1
    • Brennan, A. M., Meyer, S., David, E., Pella, R., Hill, B. D., & Gouvier, W. D. (2009). The vulnerability to coaching across measures of effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 314-328. doi:10.1080/ 13854040802054151
    • Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H.,. . . Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419-426. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002
    • Carlozzi, N. E., Grech, J., & Tulsky, D. S. (2013). Memory functioning in individuals with traumatic brain injury: An examination of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35, 906-914. doi:10.1080/ 13803395.2013.833178
    • Central Office of Statistics for the Netherlands [Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek]. (2011). Datalevering Enquête Beroepsbevolking. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.nl
    • Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28, 771-783. doi:10.1093/ arclin/act073
    • Glassmire, D. M., Bierley, R. A., Wisniewski, A. M., Greene, R. L., Kennedy, J. E., & Date, E. (2003). Using the WMS-III Faces subtest to detect malingered memory impairment. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 465-481. doi:10.1076/jcen.25.4.465.13875
    • Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218-224. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.3.218
    • Haines, M. E., & Norris, M. P. (1995). Detecting the malingering of cognitive deficits: An update. Neuropsychological Review, 5, 125-148. doi:10.1007/ BF02208438
    • Haines, M. E., & Norris, M. P. (2001). Comparing student and patient simulated malingerers' performance on standard neuropsychological measures to detect feigned cognitive deficits. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 171-182. doi:10.1076/ clin.
    • Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Corrected Participants1. (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093-1129. doi:10.1080/13854040903155063
    • Heinly, M. T., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Love, J. M., & Brennan, A. (2005). WAIS digit span-based indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Classification accuracy in traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 12, 429-444. doi:10.1177/ 1073191105281099
    • Hendriks, M. P. H., Bouman, Z., Kessels, R. P. C., & Aldenkamp, A. P. (2014). Wechsler Memory ScaleFourth Edition, Dutch Edition (WMS-IV-NL). Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment.
    • Holdnack, J. A., & Drozdick, L. W. (2009). Advanced clinical solutions for use with WAIS-IV and WMS-IV. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
    • Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.
    • Iverson, G. L., & Tulsky, D. S. (2003). Detecting malingering on the WAIS-III. Unusual Digit Span performance patterns in the normal population and in clinical groups. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 1-9. doi:10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00176-7
    • Jelicic, M., Merckelbach, H., Candel, I., & Geraerts, E. (2007). Detection of feigned cognitive dysfunction using special malinger tests: A simulation study in naïve and coached malingerers. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 117, 1185-1192. doi:10.1080/ 00207450600934697
    • Killgore, W. D., & DellaPietra, L. (2000). Using the WMS-III to detect malingering: Empirical validation of the rarely missed index (RMI). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 761-771. doi:10.1076/jcen.22.6.761.960
    • Lange, R. T., Iverson, G. L., Sullivan, K., & Anderson, D. (2006). Suppressed working memory on the WMS-III as a marker for poor effort. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 294-305. doi:10.1080/13803390490918156
    • Lange, R. T., Sullivan, K., & Anderson, D. (2005). Ecological validity of the WMS-III rarely missed index in personal injury litigation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 412- 424. doi:10.1080/13803390490520319
    • Langeluddecke, P. M., & Lucas, S. K. (2003). Quantitative measures of memory malingering on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition in mild head injury litigants. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 181-197. doi:10.1016/S0887- 6177(01)00195-0
    • Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 410-425. doi:10.1076/clin.17.3.410.18089
    • Larrabee, G. J. (2007). Introduction: Malingering, research designs, and base rates. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neurocognitive deficits (pp. 3-13). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Performance validity and symptom validity in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 625-630. doi:10.1017/S1355617712000240
    • Larrabee, G. J., & Berry, D. T. R. (2007). Diagnostic classification statistics and diagnostic validity of malingering assessment. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 14-26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Lu, P. H., Rogers, S. A., & Boone, K. B. (2007). Use of standard memory tests to detect suspect effort. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 128-151). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    • Merckelbach, H., Smeets, T., & Jelicic, M. (2009). Experimental simulation: Type of malingering scenario makes a difference. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 20, 378-386. doi:10.1080/ 14789940802456686
    • Miller, J. B., Millis, S. R., Rapport, L. J., Bashem, J. R., Hanks, R. A., & Axelrod, B. N. (2011). Detection of insufficient effort using the advanced clinical solutions for the Wechsler Memory Scale, Fourth Edition. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25, 160-172. doi:10.1080/13854046.2010.533197
    • Miller, L. J., Ryan, J. J., Carruthers, C. A., & Cluff, R. B. (2004). Brief screening indexes for malingering: A confirmation of Vocabulary minus Digit Span from the WAIS-III and the Rarely Missed Index from the WMS-III. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 18, 327- 333. doi:10.1080/13854040490501592
    • Mittenberg, W., Azrin, R., Millsaps, C., & Heilbronner, R. (1993). Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 5, 34-40. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.1.34
    • Nelson, H. E. (1982). National Adult Reading Test (NART): For the assessment of premorbid intelligence in patients with dementia: Test manual. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
    • Ord, J. S., Greve, K. W., & Bianchini, K. J. (2008). Using the Wechsler Memory Scale-III to detect malingering in mild traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 689-704. doi:10.1080/ 13854040701425437
    • Rabin, L. A., Barr, W. B., & Burton, L. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 33-65.
    • Rogers, R. (2007). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    • Schagen, S., Schmand, B., de Sterke, S., & Lindeboom, J. (1997). Amsterdam Short-Term Memory test: A new procedure for the detection of feigned memory deficits. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 43-51. doi:10.1080/01688639708403835
    • Schenk, K., & Sullivan, K. A. (2010). Do warnings deter rather than produce more sophisticated malingering? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32, 752-762.
    • Schmand, B., Lindeboom, J., & Merten, T. (2005). Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test: Manual. Leiden: PITS.
    • Schmand, B., Lindeboom, J., & Van Harskamp, F. (1992). Dutch adult reading test. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
    • Schwartz, S. M., Gramling, S. E., Kerr, K. L., & Morin, C. (1998). Evaluation of intellect and deficit specific information on the ability to fake memory deficits. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21, 261- 272. doi:10.1016/S0160-2527(98)00004-1
    • Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545- 561. doi:10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545
    • Suhr, J. A., & Barrash, J. (2007). Performance on standard attention, memory, and psychomotor speed tasks as indicators of malingering. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 131-170). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Suhr, J. A., & Gunstad, J. (2000). The effects of coaching on the sensitivity and specificity of malingering measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 415- 424. doi:10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00033-5
    • Swihart, A. A., Harris, K. M., & Hatcher, L. L. (2008). Inability of the Rarely Missed Index to identify simulated malingering under more realistic assessment conditions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 120-126. doi:10.1080/13803390701249044
    • Tan, J. E., Slick, D. J., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 495-505. doi:10.1076/ clin.16.4.495.13909
    • Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering: TOMM. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
    • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation Institute for Statistics (UNESCO-UIS). (2011). International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Montreal: UNESCO-UIS.
    • Vickery, C. D., Berry, D. T., Dearth, C. S., Vagnini, V. L., Baser, R. E., Cragar, D. E., & Orey, S. A. (2004). Head injury and the ability to feign neuropsychological deficits. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 37-48. doi:10.1016/S0887- 6177(02)00170-1
    • Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition (WMS-III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
    • Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligent ScaleFourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
    • Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment.
    • Weinborn, M., Woods, S. P., Nulsen, C., & Leighton, A. (2012). The effects of coaching on the verbal and nonverbal medical symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26, 832-849. doi:10.1080/ 13854046.2012.686630
    • Williams, J. M. (1998). The malingering of memory disorder. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 105-132). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
    • Young, J. C., Caron, J. E., Baughman, B. C., & Sawyer, R. J. (2012). Detection of suboptimal effort with symbol span: Development of a new embedded index. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 159-164. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr109
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article