Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lefferts, A.G. (1997)
Publisher: Lefferts
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
<p>The reuse or discharge of industrial waste waters, containing small fractions of dispersed oil, requires a purification treatment for which membranes can be used. If only little oil is present, removal of the dispersed phase might be preferable to the more commonly applied removal of the continuous phase. For this purpose dispersed phase separators can be applied, which combine the features of conventional coalescers and membrane filtration. The membrane surface promotes coalescence (similar to a coalescer) but in the mean time the coalesced phase is separated and transferred in a continuous oil permeate phase.<p>In the present thesis the possibility to use sheets of polypropylene membrane (with a pore diameter of 0. 1 μm) as dispersed phase separators for treatment of secondary (bromo-) hexadecane-in-water emulsions stabilized by Tween-40 is investigated. The weight fraction of the dispersed phase is always lower than 0.06 and the volume to surface averaged diameter of the oil droplets is generally smaller than 10 μm. The research focuses on understanding the mechanisms controlling the permeation behavior of the oil droplets. The process can be described in two stages: firstly the droplets have to be transported form the bulk of the emulsion towards the membrane and secondly they have to coalesce and permeate.<p>In chapter 2 and 3 the transport mechanisms are determined both experimentally and theoretically. It is shown that the theories developed for collectors of solid particles, based on the convective diffusion equation, can be used to describe the transport behavior of the oil droplets in membrane modules. The main transport mechanisms are diffusion, gravity and interception. The latter occurs if the location of the stream lines and the droplet size results in contact between droplet and membrane. The influence of several parameters, such as droplet size, density of the dispersed phase, flow rate and module design can be explained using the convective diffusion theory, assuming the membrane to be a perfect sink. This means that as soon as a droplet reaches the membrane it coalesces and permeates. Since theory and experimental results agree qualitatively, it can be concluded that the system is transport limited in most cases.<p>In chapter 4, the coalescence mechanism is discussed. Only if the contact time between droplet and membrane becomes smaller than the time needed for coalescence, the system will be coalescence limited. The coalescence time, t <sub>c</sub> [s], is determined by the drainage of the aqueous film between droplet and membrane. Calculations show that t <sub>c</sub> for the small droplets under investigation against a liquid interface is smaller than I second while in case of the presence of a membrane t <sub>c</sub> will be even smaller. As the contact times are at least a few seconds, coalescence will occur which is in agreement with the perfect sink assumption. Only in case of a dead end module at high flow velocities the system becomes coalescence limited because of short contact times. Finally, at high surfactant concentrations coalescence is not detected.<p>As oil droplets are slightly negatively charged, the transport can be enhanced by electrophoresis. Therefor, in chapter 5 possibilities to apply an electric field over the emulsion are investigated. If the anode is placed at the feed side of the membrane the transport velocity is increased significantly. However, not all droplets permeate and a cream layer is formed in front of the membrane. If the anode is placed at the permeate side of the membrane, problems are encountered because of the large resistance of the continuous oil permeate phase. The electric field is situated mainly over this phase, at the cost of the electric field over the emulsion. The resistance of the permeate phase can be successfully decreased by addition of an apolar electrolyte (TBAI). Also, it is possible to circulate an aqueous phase at the permeate side. In this case, oil droplets with a diameter of several millimeters are detected in the permeate. Here, the membrane acts as a conventional coalescer. All systems show indeed an enhanced extraction in the presence of an electric field. However, we think that only the first and the last are scaleable.<p>Finally, in the general discussion the dispersed phase separator is compared to conventional emulsion separation methods. The dispersed phase separator becomes advantageous at low oil concentrations. Feasibility will increase if the remaining oil fraction in the retentate can be decreased further. Ideas for optimization in case of transport limitation are introduced, such as adjusting the flow profile to increase the interception mechanism. Problems are encountered in practice because of the presence of all kinds of impurities in industrial waste waters which will hinder the coalescence. In that case, research should focus on coalescence enhancing parameters of the membrane material such as surface potential and surface roughness. Preliminary experiments using a reflectometer indicate the importance of surface roughness, which is explained theoretically.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1 2 3 4 5 6 G.K. Anderson, C.B. Saw and M.S. Le, Oil/water separation with surface modified membranes, 1987, Environmental Technology Letters, vol. 8, p.121-132.
    • J. Koning and D.M. Koenhen, Membranes and their use in the treatment of oily water, Chemicals in the oil industry: development and applications, 1990.
    • M.C. Porter, Handbook of industrial membrane technology, Moyes publication, Park Ridge, New Yersey, USA, 1988.
    • D.F. Sherony, R.C. Kintner and D.T. Wasan, Coalescence of Secondary Emulsions in fibrous beds, 1978, Surface and Colloid Science, vol.10, p.99-161.
    • A. Benedek and F.A. Tonelli, Innovative technologies for treatment of oily waste waters, 1992, Iron and Steel Engineer, vol 6, p.44-49.
    • D. Bhattacharyya, A.B. Jumawan and R.B. Grieves, Ultrafiltration characteristics of oil-detergent-water systems: membrane fouling mechanisms, 1979, Separation Science and Technology, vol.14, no.6, p.529-549.
    • L. Yiiksel, R. Sedelies, U. Müller and B. Spei, A new concept in the economical treatment of waste emulsions: chemical breaking and membrane filtration, 1991, Industrie Minérale-Mines et Carrières-Les Techniques, vol.7, p. 126-131.
    • G.K. Anderson and C.B. Saw, Oil/water separation with surface modified membranes, 1987, Environmental Technology Letters, vol.8, p.121-132.
    • F. Vigo, C. Uliana and P. Lupino, The performance of a rotating module in oily emulsions ultrafiltration, 1985, Separation Science and Technology, vol.20, no.2, p.213-230.
    • K. Scott, I..F. McConvey and A. Adhamy, Application of crossflow microfiltration to emulsion separation in extraction processes, 1992, Journal of Membrane Science, vol.72, p.245-257.
    • P. Lipp, C.H. Lee, A.G. Fane and C.J.D Fell, A fundamental study of the ultrafiltration of oil-water emulsions, 1988, Journal of Membrane Science, vol.36, p. 161-177.
    • R.L. Goldsmith, D.A. Robberts and D.L. Burre, Ultrafiltration of soluble oil wastes, 1974, Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, vol.46, no.9, p.2183-2192.
    • E. Dahlquist. Demulsification of O/W emulsions by filtration with special emphasis on cross flow filtration, 1991, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 197 p's.
    • J. Murkes, Cross flow filtration of emulsions combined with coalescing; a new coalescer concept, 1986, Proceedings of the 5* World Filtration Congress, Oostend, chapter 11, p.35-41.
    • M. Hlavacek, Break-up of oil-in-water emulsions induced by permeation through a microfiltration membrane, 1995, Journal of Membrane Science, vol.102, p.1-7.
    • U. Daiminger, W. Nitsch, P. Plucinski and S. Hoffmann, Novel techniques for oil/water separation, 1995, Journal of Membrane Science, vol.99, p. 197-203.
    • H. Unno, H. Saka and T. Akehata, Oil separation from oil-water mixture by a porous poly(tetrafluoroethylene) membrane, 1986, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, vol.19, no.4, p.281-286.
    • K. Ueyama, K. Fukuura and S. Furusaki, Oil-phase permeation behavior of O/W emulsion through a porous polytetrafluoroethylene membrane, 1987, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, vol.20, no.6, p.618-622.
    • M.J. Semmens and P. Magdich, Breaking oil water emulsions with microporous membranes, 1990, Proceedings of the 1990 International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes, p.61-62.
    • V.B. Hughes and A.W. Foulds, Coalescence of oil-in-water emulsions: Development of a novel fibrous bed coalescer using surface treated polypropylene fibers, 1986, Proceedings of the World Filtration Congress, Oostende, Belgium, 21-24 April.
    • Y.P. Sedlukho, Application of new coalescence method for treatment of emulsified petroleum products waste water, 1991, Water Science and Technology, vol.24, no.7, p.261-269.
    • G. Akay and R.J. Wakeman, Ultrafiltration and microfiltration of surfactant dispersions: an evaluation of published research, 1993, TransIChemE, vol.75-A, p.411.
    • C.G. Vinson and S.W. Churchill, Removal of drops from liquid-liquid dispersions upon flow through screens, 1970, The Chemical Engineering Journal, vol.1, p. 110-119.
    • F.N.M. Knops, H. Futselaar, T. Reith and LG. Räcz, Efficiëntere microfiltratie met transversaal aangestroomde module, 1991, Procestechnologie, vol.l 1, p.21-27.
    • H.B. Winzeler and H. Zindel, Enhanced Ultrafiltration with Secondary and Pulsed Flow, 1993, Abstracts of the International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes, Heidelberg, Germany, p.4.23.
    • D.F. Sherony, R.C. Kintner and D.T. Wasan, Coalescence of Secondary Emulsions in Fibrous Beds, 1978, Surface and Colloid Science vol.10, p.99-161.
    • J.T.F. Keurentjes, M.A. Cohen Stuart, D. Brinkman, C.G.P.H. Schroën and K. van 't Riet, Surfactant-induced Wetting Transitions; Role of Surface Hydrophobicity and Effect on Oil Permeability of Ultrafiltration Membranes, 1990, Colloids and Surfaces, vol.51, p.189-195.
    • S.S. Sareen, P.M. Rose, R.C. Gudesen and R.C. Kintner, Coalescence in fibrous beds, 1966, AIChE Journal, vol.12, no.6, p.1045-1050.
    • S. Basu, A study on effect of wetting on mechanism of coalescence in a model coalescer, 1993, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol.159, p.68-76.
    • J. Chieu, E.F. Gloyna and R.S. Schechter, Device for Evaluating Coalescence of Oil Emulsions, 1977, Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, vol.4, p.163-175.
    • D.G. Austin and G.V. Jeffreys, Coalescence phenomena in liquid-liquid systems, 1981, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol.31, p.475-488.
    • E.J. Clayfield, A.G. Dixon, A.W. Foulds and R.J.L. Miller, The coalescence of secondary dispersions, 1985, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol.104, no.2, p.500-519.
    • G.A. Davies and G.V. Jeffreys, Coalescence of droplets in Packings; Factors affecting the Separation of Droplets Dispersions, 1969, Filtration and Separation, July/August, p.349-354.
    • F. Penacorada, A. Angelova, H. Kamusewitz, J. Reiche and L. Brehmer, Scanning Force Microscopy and wetting studies of the surface modification of a polypropylene membrane by means of a Langmuir-Blodgett film deposition, 1995, Langmuir, vol.l 1, no.2, p.612-617.
    • E. Dickinson, B.S. Murray and G. Stainsby, Direct automated observation of emulsion droplet coalescence, 1986, Food Emulsions and Foams; Proceedings of an International Symposium organized by the Food Chemistry Group of the Royal Society of Chemistry at Leeds, p.286-288.
    • J.C. Dijt, Kinetics of polymer adsorption, desorption and exchange, 1993, Ph.D. thesis at the Agricultural University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.
    • K. Schroën, Physical Chemistry and process engineering of an emulsion/membrane bioreactor, 1995, Ph.D. thesis at the Agricultural University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.
    • S.Y. Shulepov and G. Frens, Surface roughness and the particle size effect on the rate of slow, perikinetic coagulation, 1995, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol.170, p.44-49.
    • M.A. Hubbe, Detachment of colloidal particles from flat surfaces exposed to flow; Mechanism of release, 1985, Colloids and Surfaces, vol.16, p.249-270.
    • G. Tchobanoglous and F.L. Burton, Waste Water Engineering Treatment, Disposal and Reuse, 1991, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1334 p's.
    • K. Boode, Partial coalescence in oil-in-water emulsions, 1992, Ph.D. thesis at the Agricultural University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.
    • P.A. Buining, C. Pathmamanoharan, A.P. Philipse and H.N. Lekkerkerker, Preparation of (non-)aqueous dispersions of colloidal boehmite needles, 1993, Chemical Engineering Science, vol.48, no.2,p.411-417.
    • P.A. Buining and H.N.W. Lekkerkerker, Isotropic-Nematic Phase Separation of a Dispersions of Organophilic Boehmite Rods, 1993, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol.97, no.44, p.11510-11516.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article

Collected from