Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Rypdal, Martin; Fredriksen, Hege-Beate; Rypdal, Kristoffer; Steene, Rebekka (2018)
Types: Preprint
Subjects: climate change, equilibrium climate sensitivity, emergent constraint
Equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is widely used in assessments of anthropogenic climate change, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change1 has estimated the likely range of ECS to be between 1.5 and 4.5 K, with a best estimate of 3 K. Estimates of ECS from observational data are uncertain, and long time series are required due to the slow thermal response of the deep oceans. The estimates are therefore largely based on experiments in Earth system models (ESMs), and part of the uncertainty in the ECS reflects the disagreement among models. Recently, Cox et al.2 presented a method for weighting the ESMs based on how well they reproduce a theoretically informed metric of the instrumental temperature record for the years 1880 to 2016. By demonstrating that the models with higher ECS deviate more from the instrumental temperature record according to this metric, they narrowed the likely range to be between 2.2 and 3.4 K, which would imply a reduced risk of dangerous global warming. This result, however, is an artefact induced by the anthropogenic trend manifest in the last forty years of the temperature record. When the analysis is repeated using data for the years 1880-1975 there is no emergent constraint on ECS.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article

Collected from

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok