Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Nelson, Andrew R (2009)
Publisher: The University of Edinburgh
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: aggression, video games

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_PERSONALCOMPUTING, GeneralLiterature_MISCELLANEOUS
The continued upsurge in the popularity of video games has lead to persistent debate over the effects of play, particularly the use of violent video games. The present experimental study aimed to replicate the results of numerous research groups who found that playing violent video games lead to an increase in aggression and to examine peer-observer perceptions of violent game play. Two experiments were carried out; the first used 24 participants in a within-subjects design being filmed while playing a violent and a non-violent video game and recording state anger scores after each game type. The second had 28 participant observers making judgements about the film clips created in experiment one in an attempt to establish whether differences in aggression were observable. It was found that there were no differences between the experimental conditions in experiment one, and although observers performed better than chance in their judgments of experiment two, there were no differences between successful identifications of violent versus non-violent condition clips. These findings oppose the General Aggression Model of Anderson and Bushman (2002) and possible alternatives are discussed.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok