Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Donja Darai; Silvia Grätz (2012)
Publisher: Zurich: University of Zurich, Department of Economics
Types: Research
Subjects: Department of Economics, Beauty premium, gender, stereotypes, attractiveness, cooperation, Attraktion (Psychologie), Gefangenendilemma, Spieltheorie, Stereotypen, Kooperation, Kooperatives Spiel, beauty premium, Beauty premium, gender, stereotypes, attractiveness, cooperation, 330 Economics, prisoner's dilemma, Gefangenendilemma, C71, Z13, D83, Theorie, cooperation
jel: jel:D03, jel:D83, jel:C71
ddc: ddc:330
This paper investigates the influence of physical attractiveness on cooperative behavior. We survey data from 211 episodes of a television game show and combine it with independent facial attractiveness ratings of the show's contestants. The final of the show represents a simultaneous one-shot modified prisoner's dilemma. Our results show that facially attractive contestants provoke cooperative behavior from their counterparts, but attractive contestants themselves do not behave differently from unattractive ones. This preferential treatment or beauty premium rewards attractive contestants with substantially higher monetary gains of up to £2 153. This finding applies to both sexes. But, the attractiveness effect is limited to mixed-gender interactions. Contestants are only more cooperative when facing an attractive fellow player of the opposite sex. Attractiveness also has no effect in group-decisions made by the contestants prior to the prisoner's dilemma. Therefore people seem to show a preference to cooperate with someone towards whom they are personally attracted; and this preference reaches full effect when people lack other information on which to base their decision.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alreck, P. L., and R. B. Settle (1995): The Survey Research Handbook. Chicago: Irwin.
    • Andreoni, J., and R. Petrie (2008): \Beauty, Gender and Stereotypes: Evidence from Laboratory Experiments," Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 73{93.
    • Antonakis, J., and O. Dalgas (2009): \Predicting Elections: Child's Play!," Science, 323, 1183.
    • Ashmore, R. D., and L. C. Longo (1995): \Accuracy of Stereotypes: What Research on Physical Attractiveness can Teach us," in Stereotype Accuracy: Toward Appreciating Group Di erences, ed. by Y. Lee, L. Jussim, and C. McCauley, chap. 3, pp. 63{86. American Psycological Association.
    • Belot, M., V. Bhaskar, and J. van de Ven (2010): \Promises and Cooperation: Evidence from a TV Game Show," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 73, 396{405.
    • (2012): \Beauty and the Sources of Discrimination," Journal of Human Resources, 47(3), 851{872.
    • Berggren, N., H. Jordahl, and P. Poutvaara (2010): \The Looks Of A Winner: Beauty And Electoral Success," Journal of Public Economics, 94, 8{15.
    • Bertrand, M., D. Karlan, S. Mullainathan, E. Shafir, and J. Zinman (2010): \What's Advertising Content Worth? Evidence from a Consumer Credit Marketing Field Experiment," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 263{305.
    • Biddle, J. E., and D. S. Hamermesh (1994): \Beauty and the Labor Market," American Economic Review, 84(5), 1174{1194.
    • (1998): \Beauty, Productivity, and Discrimination: Lawyers' Looks and Lucre," Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 172{201.
    • Castillo, M., R. Petrie, and M. Torero (2011): \Beautiful or White? Discrimination in Group Formation," Working Paper.
    • Charness, G., and M. Dufwenberg (2006): \Promises and Partnership," Econometrica, 74(6), 1579{1601.
    • Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby (1987): \From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link," in The Lates on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, ed. by J. Dupre, chap. 13, pp. 277{306. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    • Darai, D., and S. Gratz (2010): \Determinants of Successful Cooperation in a Faceto-Face Social Dilemma," Working Paper.
    • Dion, K., E. Berscheid, and E. Walster (1972): \What Is Beautiful Is Good," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285{290.
    • Dreber, A., C. Gerdes, and P. Gransmark (2013): \Beauty Queens and Battling Knights: Risk Taking and Attractiveness in Chess," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 90, 1{18.
    • Eagly, A. H., R. D. Ashmore, M. G. Makhijani, and L. C. Longo (1991): \What is Beautiful is Good, But...: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research on the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype," Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109{128.
    • Eckel, C. C., and R. Petrie (2011): \Face Value," American Economic Review, 101, 1497{1513.
    • Erwin, P. G., and A. Calev (1984): \Beauty: More than Skin Deep?," Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 359{361.
    • Feingold, A. (1992): \Good-Looking People Are Not What We Think," Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304{341.
    • Goldman, W., and P. Lewis (1977): \Beautiful is Good: Evidence that the Physically Attractive are More Socially Skillful," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 125{130.
    • Grammer, K., B. Fink, A. P. M ller, and R. Thornhill (2003): \Darwinian Aesthetics: Sexual Selection and the Biology of Beauty," Biological Review, 78, 385{ 407.
    • Jackson, L. A., J. H. Hunter, and C. N. Hodge (1995): \Physical Attractiveness and Intellectual Competence: A Meta-Analysis Review," Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 108{122.
    • Kahn, A., J. Hottes, and W. L. Davis (1971): \Cooperation and Optimal Responding in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game: E ects of Sex and Physical Attractiveness," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(3), 267{279.
    • Landry, C. E., A. Lange, J. A. List, M. K. Price, and N. G. Rupp (2006): \Toward an Understanding of the Economics of Charity: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 747{782.
    • Langlois, J. H., L. Klakanis, A. J. Rubenstein, A. Larson, M. Hallam, and M. Smoot (2000): \Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review," Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390{423.
    • List, J. A. (2006): \Friend or Foe? A Natural Experiment of the Prisoner's Dilemma," The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3), 463{471.
    • Mobius, M. M., and T. S. Rosenblat (2006): \Why Beauty Matters," The American Economic Review, 96(1), 222{235.
    • Mueller, U., and A. Mazur (1997): \Facial Diominance in Homo Sapiens as Hinest Signaling of Male Quality," Behavioral Ecology, 8, 569{579.
    • Mulford, M., J. Orbell, C. Shatto, and J. Stockard (1998): \Physical Attractiveness, Opportunity and Success in Everyday Exchange," The American Journal of Sociology, 103(6), 1565{1593.
    • Ortmann, A., and L. K. Tichy (1999): \Gender di erences in the laboratory: evidence from prisoner's dilemma games," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39, 327{339.
    • Ottati, V. C., and M. Deiger (2002): \Visual Cues and the Candidate Evaluation Process," in Social Psychology of Politics, ed. by V. C. Ottati, and R. S. Tindale, pp. 75{87. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
    • Rosar, U., M. Klein, and T. Beckers (2008): \The Frog Pond Beauty Contest: Physical Attractiveness and Electoral Success of the Constituency Candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia State Election of 2005," European Journal of Political Research, 47, 64{79.
    • Rosenblat, T. S. (2008): \The Beauty Premium: Physical Attractiveness and Gender in Dictator Games," Negotiation Journal, 24(4), 465{481.
    • Ruffle, B. J., and Z. Shtudiner (2011): \Are Good-Looking People More Employable?," Working Paper.
    • Solnick, S. J., and M. E. Schweitzer (1999): \The In uence of Physical Attractiveness and Gender on Ultimatum Game Decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 79(3), 199{215.
    • Vanberg, C. (2008): \Why Do People Keep Their Promises? An Experimental Test of Two Explanations," Econometrica, 76(6), 1467{1480.
    • Wilson, R. K., and C. C. Eckel (2006): \Judging a Book by its Cover: Beauty and Expectations in the Trust Game," Political Research Quarterly, 59(189), 188{202.
    • Zuckerman, M., and R. E. Driver (1989): \What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype," Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 67{82.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok