LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Scott E. Carrell; Marianne E. Page; James E. West (2009)
Types: Preprint
Subjects: jel: jel:I20, jel:J24

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_THECOMPUTINGPROFESSION, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION, ComputingMilieux_GENERAL
mesheuropmc: education
Why aren't there more women in science? Female college students are currently 37 percent less likely than males to obtain a bachelor's degree in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), and comprise only 25 percent of the STEM workforce. This paper begins to shed light on this issue by exploiting a unique dataset of college students who have been randomly assigned to professors over a wide variety of mandatory standardized courses. We focus on the role of professor gender. Our results suggest that while professor gender has little impact on male students, it has a powerful effect on female students' performance in math and science classes, their likelihood of taking future math and science courses, and their likelihood of graduating with a STEM degree. The estimates are largest for female students with very strong math skills, who are arguably the students who are most suited to careers in science. Indeed, the gender gap in course grades and STEM majors is eradicated when high performing female students' introductory math and science classes are taught by female professors. In contrast, the gender of humanities professors has only minimal impact on student outcomes. We believe that these results are indicative of important environmental influences at work.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1National Bureau of Economic Research (2006) 2National Science Foundation (2006) 3Feingold (1988) Friedman (1989) Goldin, Katz, and Kuziemko (2006) Hyde (1981) Hyde, Fennema, and Lamon (1990) Leahey and Guo (2001) Linn and Hyde (1989) National Science Foundation (1904) Nowell and Hedges (1998) and Xie and Shauman (2003).
    • 4See Boggiano, Main, and Katz (1988), Cutrona, Cole, Colangelo, Assouline, and Russell (1994), Elliott and Dweck (1988) and Harackiewicz and Elliot (1993).
    • 5See Arnold (1995), Badgett and Folbre (2003), Betz (1997), Betz and Hackett (1981), Betz and Hackett (1983), Eccles (1987), Hyde (1997), Hall and Sandler (1982), Hanson (1996), Lapan, Shaughnessy, and Boggs (1996), Leslie, McClure, and Oaxaca (1998), Lunneborg (1982), Seymour and Hewitt (2000), Tobias (1993), Tobias and Lin (1991) and Ware and Lee (1988).
    • 6See Nixon and Robinson (1999), Ehrenberg, Goldhaber, and Brewer (1995), Dee (2005), Dee (2007), Holmlund and Sund (2007), Carrington, Tymms, and Merrell (2005), Carrington, Tymms, and Merrell (2008), Lahelma (2000) and Lavy and Schlosser (2007) 7While the students in Ho man and Oreopoulos's dataset are not randomly assigned and do not take mandatory STEM courses, their dataset has one similarity to ours, which is that course grades are determined by a general exam that is given to all students enrolled in the course, regardless of which professor they have taken the course from. 22For recent work estimating teacher value-added models see Rivkin, Hanushek, and Kain (2005), Kane, Rocko , and Staiger (2008), Kane and Staiger (2008), Ho mann and Oreopoulos (2009), and Carrell and West (2008).
    • Badgett, M. V. L., and N. Folbre (2003): \Job Gendering: Occupational Choice and the Marriage Market," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 270{298.
    • Barron, J. M., B. T. Ewing, and G. R. Waddell (2000): \The E ects of High School Participation on Education and Labor Market Outcomes," The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 409{421.
    • Bettinger, E., and B. T. Long (2005): \Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students," American Economic Review, 95(2), 152{157.
    • Betz, N. (1997): \What Stops Women and Minorities from Choosing and Completing Majors in Science and Engineering?," in Minorities and Girls in School: E ects on Achievement and Performance, ed. by D. Johnson, and D. H. Johnson, pp. 105{140. Sage Publications.
    • Betz, N. E., and G. Hackett (1981): \The Relationship of Career-Related Self-E cacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College Women and Men," Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(5), 399{410.
    • (1983): \The Relationship of Mathematics Self-E cacy Expectations to the Selection of Science-Based College Majors," Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23(3), 329{345.
    • Beyer, S. (1997): \Gender Di erences in the Accuracy of Self-Evaluations of Performance," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 960{970.
    • Beyer, S., and E. M. Bowden (1997): \Gender Di erences in Self-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 157{172.
    • Black, S. L., and P. E. Strahan (2001): \The Division of Spoils: Rent-sharing and discrimination in a regulated industry," American Economic Review, 91(4), 814{831.
    • Blakemore, A. E., and S. A. Low (1984): \Sex Di erences in Occupational Selection: The Case of College Majors," The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(1), 157{163.
    • Blau, F. D., and L. M. Kahn (2000): \Gender Di erences in Pay," The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 75{99.
    • Boggiano, A. K., D. S. Main, and P. A. Katz (1988): \Children's Preference for Challenge: The Role of Perceived Competence and Control," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 134{141.
    • Brown, C., and M. Corcoran (1997): \Sex-Based Di erences in School Content and the MaleFemale Wage Gap," Journal of Labor Economics, 15(3), 431{465.
    • Canes, B., and H. Rosen (1995): \Following in Her Footsteps? Faculty Gender Composition and Womens Choices of College Majors," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 486{504.
    • Carrell, S. E., R. L. Fullerton, and J. E. West (2008): \Does Your Cohort Matter? Estimating Peer E ects in College Achievement," Working Paper 14032, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    • Carrell, S. E., and J. E. West (2008): \Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors," Working Paper 14081, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    • Carrington, B., P. Tymms, and C. Merrell (2005): \Forget Gender: Whether a Teacher is Male or Female Doesn't Matter," in Teacher, vol. 11. Australian Council for Educational Research.
    • Cutrona, C. E., V. Cole, N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, and D. W. Russell (1994): \Perceived Parental Social Support and Academic Achievement: An Attachment Theory Perspective," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 369{378.
    • Dee, T. S. (2005): \A Teacher Like Me: Does Race, Ethnicity, or Gender Matter?," American Economic Review, 95(2), 158{165.
    • (2007): \Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Student Achievement," J. Human Resources, 42(3), 528{554.
    • DiPrete, T. A., and C. Buchmann (2006): \Gender-Speci c Trends in the Value of Education and the Emerging Gender Gap in College Completion," Demography, 43(1), 1{24.
    • Eccles, J. S. (1987): \Gender Roles and Women's Achievement-Related Decisions," Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135{172.
    • Eckel, C. C., and P. J. Grossman (2008): \The Di erence in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence," in Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, ed. by C. Plott, and V. Smith, vol. 1. Elsevier.
    • Ehrenberg, R. G., D. D. Goldhaber, and D. J. Brewer (1995): \Do Teachers' Race, Gender, and Ethnicity Matter? Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 547{561.
    • Eide, E. (1994): \College Major Choice and Changes in the Gender Wage Gap," Contemporary Economic Policy, 12(2), 55{64.
    • Elliot, A. J., and J. M. Harackiewicz (1994): \Goal Setting, Achievement Orientation, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Mediational Analysis," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 968{980.
    • Elliott, E. S., and C. S. Dweck (1988): \Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5{12.
    • Feingold, A. (1988): \Does Cognitive Gender Di erences are Disappearing," American Psychologist, 43(2), 95{103.
    • Friedman, L. (1989): \Mathematics and the Gender Gap: A Meta-Analysis of Recent Studies on Sex Di erences in Mathematical Tasks," Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 185{213.
    • Goldin, C., L. Katz, and I. Kuziemko (2006): \The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 133{156.
    • Goldin, C., and C. Rouse (2000): \Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of \Blind Auditions on Female Musicians," American Economic Review, 90(4), 715{742.
    • Hall, R. M., and B. R. Sandler (1982): \The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women?," Report 1982-02-00, Association of American Colleges.
    • Hanson, S. L. (1996): \Lost Talent: Women in the Sciences," Report, Temple University Press.
    • Harackiewicz, J. M., and A. J. Elliot (1993): \Achievement Goals and Intrinsic Motivation," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 904{915.
    • Hodge, R. W., P. M. Siegel, and P. H. Rossi (1964): \Occupational Prestige in the United States, 1925-63," American Journal of Sociology, 70(3), 286.
    • Hoffmann, F., and P. Oreopoulos (2007): \A Professor Like Me: The In uence of Instructor Gender on College Achievement," Working Paper 13182, National Bureau of Economic Research. (2009): \Professor Qualities and Student Achievement," Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 83{92.
    • Holmlund, H., and K. Sund (2007): \Is the Gender Gap in School Performance A ected by the Sex of the Teacher," Labour Economics, 15(1), 37{53.
    • Hyde, J. S. (1981): \How Large are Cognitive Gender Di erences? A Meta-Analysis using !w2 and d," American Psychologist, 36(8), 892{901.
    • Hyde, J. S. (1997): \Gender Di erences in Math Performance: Not Big, Not Biological," in Women, Men, and Gender: Ongoing Debates, ed. by M. R. Walsh, pp. 283{287. Yale University Press.
    • Hyde, J. S., E. Fennema, and S. J. Lamon (1990): \Gender Di erences in Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis," Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139{155.
    • Jacobs, J. A. (1996): \Gender Inequality and Higher Education," Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 153{185.
    • Kahle, J. B., and M. L. Matyas (1987): \Equitable Science and Mathematics Education: A Discrepancy Model," in Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career Di erentials in Science and Engineering, ed. by L. S. Dix, vol. 3c. National Academy Press.
    • Kane, T. J., J. E. Rockoff, and D. O. Staiger (2008): \What does certi cation tell us about teacher e ectiveness? Evidence from New York City," Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615 631.
    • Kane, T. J., and D. O. Staiger (2008): \Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation," Working Paper 14607, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    • Lahelma, E. (2000): \Lack of Male Teachers: A Problem for Students or Teachers?," Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 8(2), 173{186.
    • Lapan, R. T., P. Shaughnessy, and K. Boggs (1996): \E cacy Expectations and Vocational Interests as Mediators between Sex and Choice of Math/Science College Majors: A Longitudinal Study," Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 277 291.
    • Lavy, V., and A. Schlosser (2007): \Does Being with More Girls in School Improve Students Human Capital Outcomes and Behavior? Evidence on E ects and Mechanisms," unpublished manuscript.
    • Leahey, E., and G. Guo (2001): \Gender Di erences in Mathematical Trajectories," Social Forces, 80(2), 713{732.
    • Leslie, L. L., G. T. McClure, and R. L. Oaxaca (1998): \Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. A Life Sequence Analysis," Journal of Higher Education, 69(3), 239{276.
    • Linn, M. C., and J. S. Hyde (1989): \Gender, Mathematics, and Science," Educational Researcher, 18(8), 17{27.
    • Lunneborg, P. W. (1982): \Role Model In uences of Nontraditional Professional Women," Journal of Vocational Behavior, 20(3), 276{281.
    • Margolis, J., and A. Fisher (2002): Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Nowell, A., and L. V. Hedges (1998): \Trends in Gender Di erences in Academic Achievement from 1960 to 1994: An Analysis of Di erences in Mean, Variance, and Extreme Scores," Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 39(1-2), 21{43.
    • Polachek, S. W. (1978): \Sex di erences in college major," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 31(4), 498{508.
    • Reskin, B. F. (1984): Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. National Academy Press.
    • Rivkin, S. G., E. A. Hanushek, and J. F. Kain (2005): \Teachers, Schools and Academic Achievement," Econometrica, 73(2), 417{58.
    • Rothstein, D. S. (1995): \Do Female Faculty In uence Female Students Educational and Labor Market Attainments?," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 515{30.
    • Seymour, E., and N. M. Hewitt (2000): Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview Press, 2 edn.
    • Spencer, S. J., C. M. Steele, and D. M. Quinn (1999): \Stereotype Threat and Womens Math Performance," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4{28.
    • Stake, J. E., and C. R. Granger (1978): \Same-Sex and Opposite-Sex Teacher Model In uences on Science Career Commitment Among High School Students," Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 180{186.
    • Steele, C. M. (1997): \A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance," American Psychologist, 52(6), 613{629.
    • Steele, C. M., and J. Aronson (1995): \Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797{811.
    • Tobias, S. (1993): Overcoming Math Anxiety. W. W. Norton and Company, New York, NY.
    • Tobias, S., and H. Lin (1991): \They're Not Dumb, They're Di erent: Stalking the Second Tier," American Journal of Physics, 59(12), 1155{1157.
    • Ware, N. C., and V. E. Lee (1988): \Sex Di erences in Choice of College Science Majors," American Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 593{614.
    • Weinberger, C. J. (1998): \Race and Gender Wage Gaps in the Market for Recent College Graduates," Industrial Relations, 37(1), 67{84.
    • (1999): \Mathematical College Majors and the Gender Gap in Wages," Industrial Relations, 38(3), 407{413.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article