Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Zhu Wang (2006)
Types: Preprint
Subjects: Technology
An industry typically experiences initial mass entry and later shakeout of producers over its life cycle. It can be explained as a competitive equilibrium outcome driven by the dynamic interaction between technology progress and demand diffusion. When a new product is introduced, high-income consumers tend to adopt it first. Technology then improves with cumulative output and demand growth generates S-shaped diffusion as the product penetrates lower-income groups. Eventually fewer new adopters are available and the number of firms starts to decline. It is shown that faster technological learning, higher mean income or larger market size contributes to faster demand diffusion and earlier industry shakeout. Empirical studies on the US and UK television industries as well as ten other US industries confirm the theoretical findings. ; Alternate title: Income distribution, market size and the evolution of industry
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [5] Bogart, Leo, (1972). The Age of Television. F. Ungar Pub. Co., New York.
    • [6] B.C.G., (1972). “Perspectives on Experience,” Technical Report, Boston.
    • [17] Griliches, Zvi, (1957). “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change,” Econometrica, 25 (Oct.), 501-522.
    • [18] Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman, (1991). “Endogenous Product Cycles,” The Economic Journal, 101, 1212-1229.
    • [19] Hopenhayn, H., (1993). “The Shakeout,” mimeo, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    • [20] Horsky, Dan, (1990). “A Diffusion Model Incorporating Product Benefits, Price, Income and Information,” Marketing Science, 9 (Autumn), 342-365.
    • [21] Horvath, Michael, Fabiano Schivardi and Michael Woywode, (2001). “On Industry Life-Cycles: Delay, Entry, and Shakeout in Beer Brewing,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 1023-1052.
    • [22] Jovanovic, Boyan and G. M. MacDonald, (1994). “The Life Cycle of a Competitive Industry,” Journal of Political Economy, 102 (Apr.), 322-347.
    • [23] Jovanovic, Boyan and Peter L. Rousseau, (2002). “Moore's Law and LearningBy-Doing,” Review of Economic Dynamics, 5 (2), 346-375.
    • [28] Lucas, Robert E., (1978). “On the Size Distribution of Business Firms,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 2, 508-523.
    • [29] Lucas, Robert E., (1993). “Making a Miracle,” Econometrica, 61, 251-272.
    • [30] Mansfield, Edwin, (1961). “Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation,” Econometrica, 29 (Oct.), 741-766.
    • [31] Matsuyama, Kiminori, (2002). “The Rise of Mass Consumption Societies,” Journal of Political Economy, 110, 5, 1035-1070.
    • [32] Rob, Rafael, (1991). “Learning and Capacity Expansion under Demand Uncertainty,” Review of Economic Studies, 58 (June), 655-675.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article