LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Alison L. Booth; Lina Cardona-Sosa; Patrick Nolen (2013)
Types: Preprint
Subjects:
We examine the effect of single-sex classes on the pass rates, grades, and course choices of students in a coeducational university. We randomly assign students to all-female, all-male, and coed classes and, therefore, get around the selection issues present in other studies on single-sex education. We find that one hour a week of single-sex education benefits females: females are 7.5% more likely to pass their first year courses and score 10% higher in their required second year classes than their peers attending coeducational classes. We find no effect of single-sex education on the subsequent probability that a female will take technical classes and there is no effect of single-sex education for males. Furthermore we are able to examine potential mechanisms and indirect effects of single-sex education. We find that the effects of single-sex education do not appear to be driven by a tracking mechanism and that there are indirect effects on class attendance and completion of optional assignments for females. However, the indirect effects cannot explain much of the effect of single-sex education for females.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Angrist, J., Lavy, V. (1999) “Using Maimonides' Rule to Estimate the effect of class size on  scholastic achievement” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 533‐575 
    • [2] Angrist,  J.,  Lavy,  V.  (2006)  “The  Effects  of  High  Stakes  High  School  Achievement  Awards:  Evidence from a Randomized Trial” American Economic Review, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 301‐331 
    • [3] Annelli,  M.  and  Giovanni,  P.  (2013)  “The  Long‐Run  Effects  of  High‐School  Class  Gender  Composition” NBER Working Paper 18744 
    • [4] Booth, A.L., and Nolen, P.J. (2012a) “Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys?”  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 81, pp. 542‐555 
    • [5] Booth, A.L., and Nolen, P.J. (2012b) “Gender Differences in Rick Behaviour: Does Nurture  Mattter?,” The Economic Journal, vol. 122, pp. F56‐F78 
    • [6] Carrell,  Scott  and  West,  James  (2010)  “Does  Professor  Quality  Matter?  Evidence  from  Random Assignment of Students to Professors,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 118, no.  3, pp. 409‐432  
    • [7] Cohen, G., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., Master, A. (2006) “Reducing the Racial Achievement Gap: A  Social‐Psychological Intervention” Science, vol. 313, pp. 1307‐1310 
    • [8] Cohen,  G.,  Garcia,  J.,  Purdie‐Vaughns,  V.,  Apfel,  N.,  Brzustoski,  P.  (2009)  “Recursive  Processes in Self‐Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement Gap” Science,  vol. 324, pp. 400‐403 
    • [9] Doris,  A.,  O'Neill,  D.,Sweetman,  O.  (2012)  “Gender,  Single0Sex  Schooling  and  Maths  Achievement”  IZA Working paper #6917 
    • [10] Duflo, E., Dupas, P., Kremer, M. (2011) “Peer Effects and the Impacts of Tracking: Evidence  from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya” American Economic Review, vol. 101, no. 5, pp.  1739‐1774 
    • [11] Eisenkopf, G., Hessami, Z., Fischbacher, U., Ursprung, H. (2011) “Academic Performance and  Single‐Sex  Schooling:  Evidence  from  a  Natural  Experiment  in  Switzerland”  University  of  Konstanz Working Paper #2011‐35 
    • [12] Ellison, G., Ashley Swanson (2010) “The Gender Gap in Secondary School Mathematics at  High Achievement Levels: Evidence from the American Mathematics Competitions” Journal  of Economic Perspectives, vol. 24, no. 2, Spring, pp. 109‐128 
    • [13] Else‐Quest, Nicole M., Janet Hyde, Marcia Linn (2010) “Cross‐National Patterns of Gender  Differences  in  Mathematics:  A  Meta‐Analysis”  Psychological  Bulletin,  vol.  136,  no.  1,  pp.  103‐127 
    • [14] Fryer, R., Steven Levitt (2010) “An Empirical Analysis of the Gender Gap in Mathematics”  American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 2, No. 2, April, pp. 210‐240 
    • [15] Gneezy,  U.,  Leonard,  K.,  and  List,  J.  (2009)  “Gender  differences  in  competition:  evidence  from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society,” Econometrica, vol. 77, pp. 1637-64 
    • [16] Goldin, Claudia, Lawrence F. Katz, Ilyana Kuziemko (2006) “The Homecoming of American  College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap” Journal of Economic Perspectives,  vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 133‐156 
    • [17] Guiso, Luigi, Ferdinando Monte, Paolo Sapienza, Luigi Zingales (2008) “Culture, Gender, and  Math” Science, vol. 320, May 30 
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok