Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mozaffari, Mohammad; Saad, Walid; Bennis, Mehdi; Debbah, Merouane (2017)
Languages: English
Types: Preprint
Subjects: Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Signal Processing, Computer Science - Information Theory

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: Computer Science::Computers and Society
In this paper, the effective use of multiple quadrotor drones as an aerial antenna array that provides wireless service to ground users is investigated. In particular, under the goal of minimizing the airborne service time needed for communicating with ground users, a novel framework for deploying and operating a drone-based antenna array system whose elements are single-antenna drones is proposed. In the considered model, the service time is minimized by jointly optimizing the wireless transmission time as well as the control time that is needed for movement and stabilization of the drones. To minimize the transmission time, first, the antenna array gain is maximized by optimizing the drone spacing within the array. In this case, using perturbation techniques, the drone spacing optimization problem is addressed by solving successive, perturbed convex optimization problems. Then, the optimal locations of the drones around the array's center are derived such that the transmission time for the user is minimized. Given the determined optimal locations of drones, the drones must spend a control time to adjust their positions dynamically so as to serve multiple users. To minimize this control time of the quadrotor drones, the speed of rotors is optimally adjusted based on both the destinations of the drones and external forces (e.g., wind and gravity). In particular, using bang-bang control theory, the optimal rotors' speeds as well as the minimum control time are derived in closed-form. Simulation results show that the proposed approach can significantly reduce the service time to ground users compared to a multi-drone scenario in which the same number of drones are deployed separately to serve ground users. The results also show that, in comparison with the multi-drones case, the network's spectral efficiency can be significantly improved.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] D. Orfanus, E. P. de Freitas, and F. Eliassen, “Self-organization as a supporting paradigm for military UAV relay networks,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 804-807, Apr. 2016.
    • [2] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Unmanned aerial vehicle with underlaid device-to-device communications: Performance and tradeoffs,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 3949-3963, June 2016.
    • [3] M. Alzenad, A. El-Keyi, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “3D placement of an unmanned aerial vehicle base station for maximum coverage of users with different QoS requirements,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, Early access, 2017.
    • [4] Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Joint trajectory and communication design for UAV-enabled multiple access,” available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01765, 2017.
    • [5] S. Jeong, O. Simeone, and J. Kang, “Mobile edge computing via a UAV-mounted cloudlet: Optimal bit allocation and path planning,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, to appear, 2017.
    • [6] V. Sharma, R. Sabatini, and S. Ramasamy, “UAVs assisted delay optimization in heterogeneous wireless networks,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2526-2529, Dec. 2016.
    • [7] I. Bor-Yaliniz and H. Yanikomeroglu, “The new frontier in RAN heterogeneity: Multi-tier drone-cells,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 48-55, Nov. 2016.
    • [8] P. Yang, X. Cao, C. Yin, Z. Xiao, X. Xi, and D. Wu, “Proactive drone-cell deployment: Overload relief for a cellular network under flash crowd traffic,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2877-2892, Oct. 2017.
    • [9] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Efficient deployment of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles for optimal wireless coverage,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1647-1650, Aug. 2016.
    • [10] “AT&T detail network testing of drones in football stadiums,” available online: https://www.androidheadlines.com/2016/09/att-detail-network-testing-of-drones-in-football-stadiums.html.
    • [11] M. M. Azari, F. Rosas, K. C. Chen, and S. Pollin, “Joint sum-rate and power gain analysis of an aerial base station,” in Proc. of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) Workshops, Washington, DC, Dec. 2016.
    • [12] J. Lyu, Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, “Placement optimization of UAV-mounted mobile base stations,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 604-607, March 2017.
    • [13] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Wireless communication using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): Optimal transport theory for hover time optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 8052-8066, Dec. 2017.
    • [14] Y. Zeng, X. Xu, and R. Zhang, “Trajectory optimization for completion time minimization in UAV-enabled multicasting,” available online: arxiv.org/abs/1708.06478, 2017.
    • [15] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Mobile unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for energy-efficient internet of things communications,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 7574-7589, Nov. 2017.
    • [16] J. Garza, M. A. Panduro, A. Reyna, G. Romero, and C. d. Rio, “Design of UAVs-based 3D antenna arrays for a maximum performance in terms of directivity and SLL,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2016, Aug. 2016.
    • [17] W. Su, J. D. Matyjas, M. J. Gans, and S. Batalama, “Maximum achievable capacity in airborne MIMO communications with arbitrary alignments of linear transceiver antenna arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 5584-5593, Nov. 2013.
    • [18] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Drone-based antenna array for service time minimization in wireless networks,” submitted to IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2018.
    • [19] J. F. Bonnans and A. Shapiro, “Optimization problems with perturbations: A guided tour,” SIAM review, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 228-264, 1998.
    • [20] L. C. Evans, “An introduction to mathematical optimal control theory,” Lecture Notes, University of California, Department of Mathematics, Berkeley, 2005.
    • [21] D. K. Cheng, “Optimization techniques for antenna arrays,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1664-1674, Dec. 1971.
    • [22] U. Challita and W. Saad, “Network formation in the Sky: Unmanned aerial vehicles for multi-hop wireless backhauling,” in Proc. of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM), Singapore, Dec. 2017.
    • [23] W. L. Stutzman and G. A. Thiele, Antenna theory and design. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
    • [24] J. E. Bobrow, S. Dubowsky, and J. Gibson, “Time-optimal control of robotic manipulators along specified paths,” The international journal of robotics research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 3-17, Sep. 1985.
    • [25] W. S. Newman, “Robust near time-optimal control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 841-844, July 1990.
    • [26] T.-S. Chung and C.-J. Wu, “A computationally efficient numerical algorithm for the minimum-time control problem of continuous systems,” Automatica, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 841-847, July 1992.
    • [27] L.-C. Lai, C.-C. Yang, and C.-J. Wu, “Time-optimal control of a hovering quad-rotor helicopter,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 115-135, Feb. 2006.
    • [28] A. Tayebi and S. McGilvray, “Attitude stabilization of a VTOL quadrotor aircraft,” IEEE Transactions on control systems technology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 562-571, May 2006.
    • [29] Y. Mutoh and S. Kuribara, “Control of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles using exact linearization technique with the static state feedback,” Journal of Automation and Control Engineering, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 340-346, Oct. 2016.
    • [30] T. Bajd, M. Mihelj, and M. Munih, “Rotation and orientation,” in Introduction to Robotics. Springer, 2013, pp. 9-36.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok