LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Preprint
Subjects: Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: Physics::Instrumentation and Detectors, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics
Direct detection experiments have reached the sensitivity required to detect dark matter WIMPs. Demonstrating that a putative signal is due to WIMPs, and not backgrounds, is a major challenge however. The direction dependence of the WIMP scattering rate provides a potential WIMP `smoking gun'. If the WIMP distribution is predominantly smooth, the Galactic recoil distribution is peaked in the direction opposite to the direction of Solar motion. Previous studies have found that, for an ideal detector, of order 10 WIMP events would be sufficient to reject isotropy, and rule out an isotropic background. We examine how the median recoil direction could be used to confirm the WIMP origin of an anisotropic recoil signal. Specifically we determine the number of events required to reject the null hypothesis that the median direction is random (corresponding to an isotropic Galactic recoil distribution) at 95% confidence. We find that for zero background 31 events are required, a factor of roughly 2 more than are required to simply reject isotropy. We also investigate the effect of a non-zero isotropic background. As the background rate is increased the number of events required increases, initially fairly gradually and then more rapidly, once the signal becomes subdominant. We also discuss the effect of features in the speed distribution at large speeds, as found in recent high resolution simulations, on the median recoil direction.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996).
    • [2] G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
    • [3] Particle Dark Matter, observations, models and searches, ed. G. Bertone, CUP (2010).
    • [4] M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 31, 3059 (1985).
    • [5] Z. Ahmed et al., arXiv:0912.3592.
    • [6] J. Angle et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 021303 (2008) arXiv:0706.0039.
    • [7] V. N. Lebedenko, Phys. Rev. D 80, 052010 (2009) arXiv:0812.1150.
    • [8] R. Bernabei, Eur. Phys. C 56, 333-355 (2008) arXiv:0804.2741.
    • [9] D. N. Spergel, Phys. Rev. D 37, 1353 (1988).
    • [10] C. J. Copi, J. Heo and L. M. Krauss, Phys. Lett. B 461, 43 (1999) astro-ph/990449; C. J. Copi and L. M. Krauss, Phys. Rev. D 63, 043507 (2001) astro-ph/0009467.
    • [11] B. Morgan, A. M. Green and N. J. C. Spooner, Phys. Rev. D 71 103507 (2005) astro-ph/0408047.
    • [12] B. Morgan and A. M. Green, Phys. Rev. D 72, 123501 (2005) astro-ph/0508134.
    • [13] A. M. Green and B. Morgan, JCAP08(2007)022 astro-ph/0609115.
    • [14] B. Morgan, Dark Matter Detection With Gas Time Projection Chambers, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, 2004.
    • [15] G. Sciolla and C. J. Martoff, New J. Phys. 11 105018 (2009) arXiv:0905.3675.
    • [16] S. Ahlen et al. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25 1-51 (2010) arXiv:0911.0323.
    • [17] G. Sciolla et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 179 012009 (2009) arXiv:0903.3895.
    • [18] D. P. Snowden-Ifft, C. J. Martoff, and J. M. Burwell, Phys. Rev. D 61, 1 (2000) astro-ph/9904064.
    • [19] G. J. Alner et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A. 535, 644 (2004).
    • [20] T. Tanimori et al., Phys. Lett. B 578, 241 (2004) astro-ph/0310638
    • [21] C. J. Copi, L. M. Krauss, D. Simmons-Duffin and S. R. Stroiney, Phys. Rev. D 75, 023614 (2007) astro-ph/0508649.
    • [22] M. S. Alenazi and P. Gondolo, Phys. Rev. D 77 043532 (2008) arXiv:0712.0053.
    • [23] M. Vogelsberger et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 395, 797 (2009) arXiv:0812.0362.
    • [24] M. Kuhlen et al. arXiv:0912.2358.
    • [25] P. Gondolo, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103513 (2002) hep-ph/0209110.
    • [26] N. I. Fisher, T. Lewis and B. J. J. Embleton, Statistical analysis of spherical data, CUP, (1987).
    • [27] J. Billard, arXiv:0911.4086.
    • [28] Y. Ramachers, Astropart. Phys. 19, 419 (2003).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from