Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Doty, Stephen (2014)
Languages: English
Types: Preprint
Subjects: 20M32, Mathematics - Representation Theory

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: Mathematics::Category Theory
The rational representation theory of a reductive normal algebraic monoid (with one-dimensional center) forms a highest weight category, in the sense of Cline, Parshall, and Scott. This is a fundamental fact about the representation theory of reductive normal algebraic monoids. We survey how this result was obtained, and treat some natural examples coming from classical groups.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. E. Cline, B. Parshall, and L. Scott: Finite dimensional algebras and highest weight categories, J. Reine Angew. Math. 391 (1988), 85-99.
    • 2. S. Donkin: On Schur algebras and related algebras I, J. Algebra 104 (1986), 310-328.
    • 3. S. Donkin: Good filtrations of rational modules for reductive groups, Proc. Symposia Pure Math. (Part I) 47 (1987), 69-80.
    • 4. S. Doty: Polynomial representations, algebraic monoids, and Schur algebras of classical type, J. Pure Applied Algebra 123 (1998), 165-199.
    • 5. S. Doty: Polynomial representations, algebraic monoids, and Schur algebras of classical type, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 123 (1998), 165-199.
    • 6. S. Doty and Jun Hu: Schur-Weyl duality for orthogonal groups, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 98 (2009), 679-713.
    • 7. E. Friedlander and A. Suslin, Cohomology of finite group schemes over a field, Invent. Math. 127 (1997), 209-270.
    • 8. D. Ju. Grigor'ev, An analogue of the Bruhat decomposition for the closure of the cone of a Chevalley group of the classical series (Russian), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 257 (1981), 1040-1044.
    • 9. M.-A. Knus, A. Merkurjev, M. Rost, and J.-P. Tignol: The book of involutions, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, 44, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998.
    • 10. M. Putcha: Linear Algebraic Monoids, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series 133, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.
    • 11. L. Renner: Classification of semisimple algebraic monoids, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 292 (1985), 193-223.
    • 12. Lex E. Renner: Linear algebraic monoids, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 134; Invariant Theory and Algebraic Transformation Groups, V. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005.
    • 13. L. Solomon: An introduction to reductive monoids, in Semigroups, formal languages and groups (York, 1993), pp. 295-352, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci., 466, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1995.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from